Practice Advisory Update Summary: Patent Foramen Ovale and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Neurol 94:876-885, Messe, S.R.,et al, 2020
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure, Antiplatelet Therapy or Anticoagulation Therapy Alone for Management of Cryptogenic Stroke?
BMJ 362:k2515, Kuijpers, T.,et al, 2018
Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke
NEJM 377:1022-1032,1006,1093, Saver, J.L.,et al, 2017
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation Vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke
NEJM 377:1011-1021,1006,1093, Mas, J.L,et al, 2017
Closure Versus Medical Therapy for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and a History of Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Stroke 47:e188-e189, Li, J.,et al, 2016
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 368:1092-1100,1152, Carroll, J.D.,et al, 2013
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Embolism
NEJM 368:1083-1091,1152, Meier, B.,et al, 2013
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Medical Treatments for Secondary Stroke Prevention
Stroke 43:422-431, Kitsios,G.D.,et al, 2012
Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale
NEJM 366:991-999,1048, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2012
Study Design of the CLOSURE I Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the STARFlex Septal Closure System Versus Best Medical Therapy in Patients With Stroke or TIA Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a PFO
Stroke 41:2872-2883, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2010
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: No
Stroke 35:804-805,806, Tong,D.C. &Becker,K.J., 2004
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: Yes
Stroke 35:803-804,806, Furlan,A.J., 2004
Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size with Stroke Recurrence and Benefit From Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
JAMA Neurol 79:1175-1179, Mas,J-L.,et al, 2022
Five-Year Outcomes of PFO Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 384:970-971, , 2021
Evidence-Based Management of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Ischemic Stroke
JAMA Neurol 75:147-148, Kamel, H., 2018
PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 378:1639-1642, Mi, M.Y.,et al, 2018
Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke
Stroke 44:2676-2678, Furlan, A.J. and Jauss, M., 2013
Critique of Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale
Stroke 43:3147-3149, Thaler, D.E.,et al, 2012
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Cryptogenic Stroke
Lancet 368:350-352, Wrle,J., 2006
Embolic Stroke Due to a Left Atrial Thrombus Two Years After Placement of an Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device
Am J Cardiol 98:1294-1296, Raghu,A.,et al, 2006
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Devices
JAMA 294:366-369, Maisel,W.H.&Laskey,W.K., 2005
Patent Foramen Ovale in Young Adults with Unexplained Stroke
NEJM 353:2361-2372, Kizer,J.R. &Devereux,R.B., 2005
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Reduces the Frequency of Migraine attacks
Neurol 62:1399-1401, Schwerzmann,M.,et al, 2004
Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale is Associated with a Decrease in Prevalence of Migraine
Neurol 62:1439-1440, Post,M.C.,et al, 2004
Practice Parameter: Recurrent Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm
Neurol 62:1042-1050, Messe,S.R.,et al, 2004
Does Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Really "Shut the Door?"
Stroek 35:2140, Anzola,G.P.,et al, 2004
Incidence and Clinical Course of Thrombus Formation on Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Devices in 1,000 Consecutive Patients
J Am Coll Cardiol 43:302-309, Krumsdorf,U.,et al, 2004
Incidence of Thrombus Formation on the CardioSEAL and the Amplatzer Interatrial Closure Devices
Am J Cardiol 93:426-431, Anzai,H.,et al, 2004
Recurrent Thromboembolic Events After Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale
ICVTS 2:125-127, Brgermann,J.,et al, 2003
Prognosis After Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Paradoxical Embolism
Neurol 57:1330-1332, Wahl,A.,et al, 2001
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Pardoxical Emboli: Intermediate-Term Risk of Recurrent Neurological Events Following Transcatheter Device Placement
J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1311-1316, Hung,J.,et al, 2000