Practice Advisory Update Summary: Patent Foramen Ovale and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Neurol 94:876-885, Messe, S.R.,et al, 2020
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure, Antiplatelet Therapy or Anticoagulation Therapy Alone for Management of Cryptogenic Stroke?
BMJ 362:k2515, Kuijpers, T.,et al, 2018
Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke
NEJM 377:1022-1032,1006,1093, Saver, J.L.,et al, 2017
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation Vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke
NEJM 377:1011-1021,1006,1093, Mas, J.L,et al, 2017
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 377:1033-1042,1006,1093, Sondergaard, L.,et al, 2017
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 368:1092-1100,1152, Carroll, J.D.,et al, 2013
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Embolism
NEJM 368:1083-1091,1152, Meier, B.,et al, 2013
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Medical Treatments for Secondary Stroke Prevention
Stroke 43:422-431, Kitsios,G.D.,et al, 2012
Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale
NEJM 366:991-999,1048, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2012
Antithrombotic and Interventional Treatment Options in Cardioembolic Transient Ischaemic Attack and Ischaemic Stroke
JNNP 78:14-24, McCabe,D.J.H. &Rakhit,R.D., 2007
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: No
Stroke 35:804-805,806, Tong,D.C. &Becker,K.J., 2004