Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the WATCHMAN Device Compared with Warfarin or Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke 49:1464-1470, Reddy, V.Y.,et al, 2018
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke
NEJM 368:1092-1100,1152, Carroll, J.D.,et al, 2013
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Embolism
NEJM 368:1083-1091,1152, Meier, B.,et al, 2013
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Medical Treatments for Secondary Stroke Prevention
Stroke 43:422-431, Kitsios,G.D.,et al, 2012
Study Design of the CLOSURE I Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the STARFlex Septal Closure System Versus Best Medical Therapy in Patients With Stroke or TIA Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a PFO
Stroke 41:2872-2883, Furlan,A.J.,et al, 2010
Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial
Lancet 374:534-542,504, Holmes,D.R.,et al, 2009
Patent Foramen Ovale in Young Adults with Unexplained Stroke
NEJM 353:2361-2372, Kizer,J.R. &Devereux,R.B., 2005
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: No
Stroke 35:804-805,806, Tong,D.C. &Becker,K.J., 2004
Patent Foramen Ovale and Recurrent Stroke: Closure is the Best Option: Yes
Stroke 35:803-804,806, Furlan,A.J., 2004